Monday) Welcome to Palmetto, Bradenton,
Sarasota, Manatee or wherever the heck they are holding the
one session open pairs. You are playing with "crazy"
Jason, your usual partner and you are playing your usually
crazy Chilli
system. There are 6 boards left to go in the round and
you are on your way to a 50% game. Take a look at the
cards below and see what you would do with Pam's hand.
1) 11-15 HCP, at least 4
hearts, could have a longer suit.
Monday Result) Pam chose the 4H bid and
East decided to take the 4S sacrifice anyway. Our defence was a bit soft
but we were able to set 4S by 3 for +500.
Theoretically, this should have been a good result for the
opponents because 4H was going to make 4 for +620 but there
must not have been many people bidding it because we got 11
out of 12 matchpoints for that score.
1) 11-15 HCP, at least 4 hearts,
could have a longer suit
2) possibly
preemptive, would like to double 4S
Tuesday) It's the second session of the
open pairs and this is round 6 of 13. You are heading
for a 57% game but are in no danger of winning the
event. Today's problem is simple. Take a look at
the hands below and see what contract you would bid to
assuming that South gets to open the bidding and E/W stay
out of the auction.
What happened) We had a respectable
auction that featured only 1 lie (by Pam) and we ended up in
the nice 6D contract. As I see it, the problem is this, "Do you
have the tools to discover whether your partner is holding
the A and K of diamonds as well as the King of Spades?"
Without these 3 cards, 7D is at best the 50-50 shot it
turned out to be in this case.
1) artificial, 14+ HCP if unbalanced, 18+ HCP if
balanced
2) Game
Forcing, at least 10 HCP, denies a 4 card major
3) At least 5 diamonds, hand is
not suitable to play in NT
4) I could make
an exclusion keycard bid with 5C here but Pam's likely
response of 5S showing 2 would make it impossible for me to
ask for the King of Spades which I need to bid 7D.
Tuesday Result) Perhaps things
would have been different in the Ax pairs but here we scored
11 out of 12 matchpoints just for getting to 6D and making 7
for +940.
Wednesday) As you
have learned by now, Chilli is an unusual canape system where
we sometimes bid our short suits before our longer
suits. I am especially fond of this hand because Pam and
I had a combined total of 23 HCP and we each got to make a
canape bid but we still managed to stop in the solid 2C
contract. If you want, you can bid the N/S hands
yourself and see if your auction would be as elegant.
1) 11-15 HCP, less than 4 hearts, at least 4 spades,
could have a longer minor suit.
2) 10-12 HCP, at
least 3 clubs, could have
longer diamonds and or longer hearts
3) clubs are at
least as long as spades
Wednesday Result)
Pam was in 2C making 4 for +130 and a dead average score of 12
out of 25 matchpoints.
Thursday) It's the first session of the open pairs and you are still hopeful because it is only the 6th board of the round. You pick up a very nice 10 count and listen as the opponents bid their way to the 6D slam. Take a look at the hand Pam held and see what you would choose to lead.
1) 22+ HCP
forcing 2) game forcing, artificial 3) long
solid diamonds, sets diamonds as trump 4) first
round control of spades
What happened)
According to Deep Fineese, (1) there are only 2
leads that set this contract. If you picked either the 8
or 10 of diamonds then you matched Pam and set the
contract. This nice lead is not the real reason I chose
this one for the Hand of the Day. You see, on the
previous board, East made a successful, balancing 4C bid after
listening to two long passes from his partner. I didn't
call the director on that one for a number of reasons.
One of the strange reasons is this. I have come to
believe that people who choose to play this "style" of bridge
pay for it with bad luck in bridge at other times. It
doesn't usually happen so quickly afterwards but this result
seemed like payback to me.
1) 22+ HCP
forcing
2) game forcing, artificial
3) long solid diamonds, sets diamonds as
trump
4) first round control of spades
Thursday Result)
6D went down 1 for +100 for us and a matchpoints score of 10
out of 12. This round was unusual in another way.
Pam and I made a lower number of errors than usual but ended
up with a bad 42% score. At the time, I said that "We
have never played so well for so little." Do you think
that we were getting paid back for our own unethical
behaviour?
Friday) It's the
first session of the Ax pairs and you find yourself sitting
across from Jason and Pam and their cute little Pre Alert
cards. No one is vulnerable when you pick up this weak
distributional hand in first seat. What are you going to
do with it?
1) 11-15 HCP, at
least 4 spades, denies 4 hearts, could have a longer
minor 2) 0-10 HCP, at least 4 spades
What
Happened) South went with the reasonable 4H bid and
crazy Jason started doubling for penalty like he was holding
two outside defensive tricks. As it turns out, my 3S bid
was misalerted as being weak when it was actually on our card
as being a limit raise. South claimed that she would
have passed again instead of bidding 4H if she had known 3S
was invitational. The director was called and South's
hand was given to a number of other equal players and,
regardless of the explanation of the 3S bid, the majority
chose to bid with the South hand so the result at the table
was allowed to stand. Take a look at the "quality" of
North's 2C overcall.
1) 11-15 HCP, at
least 4 spades, denies 4 hearts,
could have a
longer minor
2) 10-12 HCP, at least 4
spades, invitational
Friday Result) 5C* went down 4 for +800 and a cold top for us
of 38 out of 38 matchpoints. This wasn't even our
coldest top of the morning. We also got +1100 for
doubling the Non Vulnerable opponents in 3D. They played
in their 3-2 fit when they happened to be cold for 3NT.
Despite all this luck, we were only able to turn it into a 53%
game.
Saturday) I could tell you a long and unusual story that starts in November at a Sectional in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (2) and ends in Florida with the piece of paper you see below. I won't be telling that story here today but if you are curious and ever find yourself faced with the prospect of staring at me for half an hour then you should ask me about it.
Sunday) Chilli is a
precision type system that will really get you to the wrong
contract should you happen to make certain basic errors in the
early part of the auction. Every so often, Pam makes so
many errors in one day that I "punish"
her by making her play a very basic version of Standard
American that I call "No Alert Standard" or "Piggy Standard"
depending who is asking me about it. Today is such a
day. We have made it to the 6th match of a 7 match Swiss
with only 2 wins. Put yourself into Pam's depressed
frame of mind and see what you would do with her hand when
everyone is vulnerable. Keep in mind that I have made bold psych bids in the past and I have a belief
that Standard was designed to make life easy for the psych
bidders of the world.
What
Happened) Pam made the bold 5C bid and, thanks to her
previous patient passing, it got doubled for penalty. It
was easy for me to hold it to down 2 for -500. Our
partners bid and made game at their table so we won 4 IMPs
here.
Sunday Result) The best part of the hand had nothing to do
with the bridge. We were playing against two nice ladies
and on the previous board, Pam and I doubled and set them 4
for +1100 and a win of 14 IMPs. When they doubled me on
this hand, I said that perhaps I was about to go down
1100. After I went down two for 500, they made a point
of saying that 500 was not 1100. My in tempo answer was,
"I am paying you back in installments."
Despite the fact that we won 18 IMPs in the first three hands
of a 7 board Swiss match and despite the fact that I still owe
the ladies 500, we still managed to lose by a score of 24 -
28. It was just one of those days.
Why)
At week long bridge tournaments, Pam and I have been playing
this game I invented called Bridge Bingo. Essentially, I
created a list of 90 different things (ranging from likely to
very unlikely) that can happen during a week of bridge.
Then I randomly take different sets of 30 things to create
unique Bingo cards for me and Pam. Generally speaking,
the items in the top line are the easiest to get while the
items in the bottom row are the toughest. The first
person to complete a line (or complete the majority of the
line by the end of Sunday) wins the dollar amount designated
for that line. It is just another way to make bridge a
bit more exciting.
Below you can see my Bridge Bingo card from
Palmetto as well as the designated winner (a T denotes a tie)
for each line. In 6 games so far neither one of us has got a
blackout bingo.