Welcome to the Hand of the Day.  There are two ways to navigate this section.  You can either right click here to save this file and play the hands (if you have a program that allows you to load and play .PBN files) without seeing any of my commentary or you can scroll down and see what I had to say about the hands.  It is probably more interesting to play these hands but I always like to offer my partner a choice.  If you are curious to see how Pam and I made out, then you can click here to see the tournament schedule and the games we played or here to see if we placed in anything.




    Monday) I am long time critic of the popular convention known as forcing 1NT.  Let's assume that you are playing 2/1 with a forcing 1NT in tonight's bracketed knockout.  Everyone is vulnerable and your partner has just opened 1S.  What would you do here?














    What Happened) My limited understanding of the convention says that you should bid 1NT with the South hand.  Your partner responds 2D, which in your system could show as few as 3 diamonds.  Now what would you do?



1) 5-12 HCP, artificial, forcing for one round   2) at least 3 diamonds















    Monday Result) South chose to pass and North got to declare a very interesting contract.  I then decided to make the unusual lead of the 9 of spades (suit preference for hearts on the off chance that Pam were to rough it.) In my notes I said that the play was interesting.  I didn't record any more detail than that but you can see the unusual spade break for yourself.


        
   


          1) 5-12 HCP, artificial, forcing for one round
          2) at least 3 diamonds




         

    Monday Result) We set 2D by 2 for +200 and a win of 3 IMPs.  As you can see, there is no good contract for N/S to get to although 1NT can make.  In Chilli, Pam and I would probably end up in 2S (hopefully undoubled).  Looking back now, I can't see why I chose this as the hand of the day, perhaps I just needed to publically state my dislike of the forcing 1NT convention.  I will try not to let it happen again in the future.



    (1)

    Tuesday) Things are going well.  It is the third round of the first knockout and your teammate has just become a Life Master by virtue of making it through the second round.  This is board 20 of 24 in a well played match against the best team in the bracket.  The opponents have just missed bidding a cold slam and my running score indicates the match is now tied.  Take a look at Pam's hand and see what you would do with everyone vulnerable.


















    What Happened) Pam chose to go for the money and pass but in my view, she should not have had to make the choice that she did.  Now take a look at my hand and see what you would have done with it.
























    What Happened) I really wanted to bid 4C and hopefully show the majors.  I wasn't sure how Pam would take that though so I went with the "safe" double.  This turned out not to be safe at all as we set 3C by 3 for +800 and a loss of 12 IMPs.  At the other table, N/S were able to bid and make a slam.  The key question is this.  Do you and your partner have the tools/card sense/judgment to get to 6H or 6NT (but not 6S) after the 3C opener?  Do you even want to be in the vulnerable 6H/NT contract when it involves the guess the Queen game?

   
   

   

    Tuesday Result) We lost 12 IMPs on this hand and went on to lose the match by 10 IMPs.  This wasn't such a bad thing though as Iris took us all out to a great Japanese restaurant to celebrate her achievement.

   


    Wednesday) It's the fourth board of the second session of the microscopic four table A-x pairs game that you are in no danger of winning. Pam and I are playing an unusual canape/Precision system called Chilli and we are about to embark on an epic ten alert auction that ends with us in the best contract.  Take a look below and see what contract you and your partner would get to assuming North opens the bidding and the opponents stay silent.







    Wednesday Result) We were in 5S making 5 for a dead average score of 1.5 out of 3 match points.  There was some joking going on at the table though as everyone knew from our alert explanations that E/W should just cash their winning AK of hearts.

      

          1) artificial, 14+ HCP if unbalanced, 18+ HCP if balanced.
          2) at least 4 hearts, at least 4 points, could have a longer suit.

          3) artificial, 20+ HCP, Game Forcing
          4) canape with 4 hearts and at least 5 spades
          5) agrees spades as trump, asks for more information
          6) singleton or void in diamonds
          7) asks for keycards in spades
          8) 1 or 4 keycards
          9) asks for the king of hearts
          10) I don't have the king of hearts.

   








(1)

    Thursday) About once a tournament I like to head to the partnership desk and play with someone new in a morning side game.  For some reason, I keep finding interesting and or worthwhile experiences when I do that.  Today I am playing with Kenn Pendleton and we have decided to play a pretty standard version of 2/1.  It is the second board of the match and this very unusual auction comes up.  Take a look.





1) Jacoby 2NT (I know I should have 4 hearts but I am not bidding 1S)
      2) 2NT was not alerted and I don't know what 4NT is.  I think for a bit and decide that it must be ...


















    What happened) ... asking for Keycards so I bid 5C showing 1 or 4 and then I hear my partner sign off in 6H.  Would you take another call with my hand?



1) at least 4 hearts, game forcing   2) asking for keycards in hearts   3) 1 or 4
















    What happened) It took a lot of discipline not to bid 7H but I didn't think pass could be right so I bid 6NT.



    

        1) at least 4 hearts, game forcing    
        2) asking for keycards in hearts
        3) 1 or 4



    Thursday Result) Well, 6NT was the top contract and it earned us 3 out of the 4 matchpoints.  After the hand, I took Jacoby 2NT off the card and Kenn and I went on to have one of the most enjoyable rounds (from the bridge as art perspective) I have played in a while.  We only finished 4th with 55% but some of the defence that we played was beautiful to behold.




    Friday) Your name is Pam and it's the 18th of 24 boards in the second session of the 2 session A-X pairs and today is your day. You and Jason were in 1st place after the first session but the second session is going badly and you are having one of your famous "throwing it" games.  To add to the pressure, Jason will probably become a Life Master should you be able to turn things around and finish strong.  On this hand, no one is vulnerable when you make an accidental psych bid and everyone starts bidding like crazy.  Take a look at your hand below and see what you would do with it.




1) artificial, 14+ HCP if unbalanced, 18+ HCP if balanced (oops)
2) artificial, denies 4 hearts, 7-8 HCP   3) penalty




















    What Happened)  Not unreasonably, Pam chose to pass and the opponents made for 4 for -510 and 1 of the 11 matchpoints for us.  Perhaps it is just wishful thinking on my part but perhaps a 4D call by Pam here is the sort of crazy bid that has a chance of working but more importantly has a chance of turning the momentum around in this match.  You might also want to think about my North hand a bit.  Should I have been able to sniff out Pam's psych and stop doubling?

      

       1) artificial, 14+ HCP if unbalanced, 18+ HCP if balanced (oops)
       2) artificial, denies 4 hearts, 7-8 HCP
       3) penalty

    

    Friday Result) The momentum did not turn around in this match and we ended up with a score of 47% in the session and a 9th place overall finish out of 27 pairs.  As it turns out, we would have needed a 66% game to make me a life master but a second place finish was certainly possible for us at the point this hand came up.  Oh well, what fun would it be if becoming a Life Master was easy.





    (1)

    What Happened)  As you have noticed by now, I always include a cartoon at the top of every Hand of the Day section.  You wouldn't know that I have a file of 50 cartoons and I attempt to pick one that has some connection, however tenuous, with the week of bridge that we played.  In this case, the connection is obvious. 

    Tim LeVan (the man in the picture above) seemed to be about one foot taller than everyone else in the room.  At some point in the middle of the week he became a Life Master and got his picture in the Friday bulletin.  Of course, everyone at the tournament was congratulating him because he was a likeable local player but in my mind it was because he was so easy to recognize.  I was joking with Pam that I was going to ask him if he ever got asked to be a horse jockey growing up as a spoof on the question that I'm sure he has been asked all his life, "Did you ever play basketball as a kid?" Anyway, it was a memorable moment at the tournament and I think the cartoon looks quite a bit like him.






    Saturday) Everyone has their weaknesses at bridge and this hand is a perfect illustration of mine.  I have a tendency to become rattled when something unusual occurs at the table.  Once that happens, my brain turns off and I play like an idiot for about 5 minutes.  First, take a look at the hand and auction below and see what got me rattled.



1) 11-15 HCP, at least 4 hearts, could have a longer suit   2) both minors   3) possibly pre-emptive


















    What Happened) These are the sorts of doubles that happen about once a month when you are playing our unusual Canape system.  Every so often, the opponents insist on playing in my longer unbid suit and I get the pleasure of doubling for penalty?  When Pam pulled it and I got doubled, West lead the Ace of Spades and continued a spade.  Take a look at all the hands below and see if you can guess how many tricks I managed to go down.

       


          1) 11-15 HCP, at least 4 hearts, could have a longer suit
          2) both minors
          3) possibly pre-emptive

      

    Saturday Result) Looking back from a much calmer place, I have trouble believing that I went down 3 for -500 and 0 out of 8 matchpoints.





(1)                         (2)

    What Happened)  It seems like this is the proper place for embarrassing stories about Jason.  During the first session of the Saturday Open Pairs, I got to talking with Richard Popper.  To my eye, he and his partner Alex Perlin looked and certainly defended like the strongest N/S pair we played that morning.  Pam and I chatted with Richard for 5 minutes and told him a bit about our trip.  As it turned out, he was also going to Louisville and he was planning to play in the North America Pairs (NAP) in the A section while Pam and I were planning to play in the B section.

     When we arrived in Louisville at the start of the tournament, we saw Richard during the first session of the NAP and asked how he was doing.  I don't remember what he said but Pam and I decided to start making our little $2 fun bets on how Richard would do in that event as well as the upcoming Platinum Pairs game.  I ended up betting that Richard would qualify for the second session of the NAP (he didn't) and then betting that he wouldn't qualify for the second session of the three session Platinum Pairs (he did).   Pam then wanted to make a bet on whether Richard would qualify for the third session (he did) but I decided I had lost enough money so I didn't bet.

    Anyway, after the third session of the pairs, I ran into "Richard Popper" at a small store in the hotel and congratulated him on how well he did in the Platinum pairs game.  "Richard" looked confused by this and the conversation ended awkwardly.  Pam, who happened to be standing nearby, saw the conversation and told me she didn't think I had been talking to Richard Popper.  Even later on in the week, Pam and I were playing in the mixed pairs game when I saw the fake Richard Popper for the second time.  I felt compelled to go over and apologize.  As it turns out, "Richard's" real name was Robert Heitzman.  Robert knows Richard quite well and Robert was actually in the Platinum Pairs game as well as in Wilkes-Barre at the same tournament that Pam and I were at.  Take a look at both pictures again and see if you might have made my mistake.







    Why) At week long bridge tournaments, Pam and I have been playing this game I invented called Bridge Bingo.  Essentially, I created a list of 90 different things (ranging from likely to very unlikely) that can happen during a week of bridge.  Then I randomly take different sets of 30 things to create unique Bingo cards for me and Pam.  Generally speaking, the items in the top line are the easiest to get while the items in the bottom row are the toughest.  The first person to complete a line (or complete the majority of the line by the end of Sunday) wins the dollar amount designated for that line.  It is just another way to make bridge a bit more exciting.

    Below you can see my Bridge Bingo card from Wilkes-Barre as well as the designated winner (a / denotes a tie) for each line. In 7 games so far neither one of us has got a blackout bingo.










Wilkes-Barre


You can see the other 3 cards from the Florida trip here, here and here.